Vibratory Health

What are the notes, intervals, time and beats of health giving sounds or music?

Sorry, I don't have those details as every case is different. What I do have are principles that if learned, understood and applied will reconstitute that condition known as "health":

"Health is harmony. Disease is discord." Keely

Harmony = balance = equilibrium in continuous interchange.

Health must have polarity and these polarities must interchange periodically. Without polarity there is death because lack of polarity is lack of that which makes life life; i.e., polar conflicts as in male/female, black/white, hot/cold, young/old, etc. Modern medicine does not recognize polarity which is a real shame on us all. Every cell of the body is polarized. Every organ in polarized. Every action of the body is polar; i.e., breathing in/out, heart beat contraction/expansion, blood flow out/back, etc. Disrupt these rhythmic motions and life ceases.

The ebb and flow of sound and music can reinforce these rhythms through synchronization, vibratory and oscillatory sympathy and entrainment. We tend to get sedentary and lose the natural polarization and rhythms of the body. ANY kind of rhythmic motion will assist in re-establishing natural vibrations and oscillations in the body and mind. Dance, massage, walking, running, swimming, breathing, chanting, music all reinforce the natural tones.

So to point to an answer to the original question it is all about CHORDS more than specific single tone frequencies. All tones are complex due to natural occurring harmonics. So even if one has good experiences with single tone frequencies it is an illusion because of the harmonics also being experienced at the same time and cannot be escaped although they can and often are ignored.

Read Walter Russell for conditions of harmony/heath and discord/disease, etc. To go even further read Phineas P. Quimby's writings on health as an EFFECT of one's thinking. His works are on the web and can be googled easily enough.

The Word (Mind) of God

I do not disagree with you Tony. I just have a few more questions than most people permit themselves to entertain.

Take, for instance, a Bigger Picture...

How many stars are there in our galaxy called the Milky Way?

How many of those stars have occupied planets?

How many occupied planets are there in ONE galaxy?

How many galaxies are in this one photo (see above) of a teeny-weeny portion of our night sky?

How many of the countless peoples on these countless planets moving through countless galaxies have formed spiritual beliefs and written them down in their sacred texts?

How many of those countless texts would agree with each other?

Where would they agree and where would they differ?

Where and how did they get their "divine revelations"?

If you say they all got it from the same One Source then you have to explain how One Source/Entity can somewhat successfully communicate with all those countless people (in their own languages) independent of Time and Space. The only thing we know of that operates independently of Time and Space is Mind sometimes called consciousness and sometimes called undifferentiated or scalar waves by science. So could we then say God communicates to his peoples from His Mind and into their Consciousnesses? Would that be like so-called telepathy; i.e., direct communication from Divine Mind to maybe our 'Lesser Mind'? And what exactly is 'Mind' or 'Consciousness'? Is it "awareness" of self and no-self? Whatever it is is Mind not known to us via our thoughts? Are not then our thoughts a portion of our Minds? Are not then our thoughts an EXPRESSION of our Mind? Are not words an effect of our  thoughts? Therefore our words,  like our thoughts, are an expression of our  Mind.

So when a sacred text refers to the "Word of God" could it not be referring to an EXPRESSION of God? Is not the the word of God His expression? And can that Divine Expressioning take on different modes such as talking burning bushes (Moses) and thunderous disembodied voices, spontaneous revelation to consciousness (Peter), etc.?

My deeper feelings would have me question everything and suppose there is much more to this than we, sitting on this tiny and seemingly insignificant speck of dust in a back corner of our galaxy, could surmise from our all too brief view and contemplation of Time and Space and all that it means.

The Value of Dynaspheres

Lots of people misbelieve my work is mostly "airy-fairy physics-metaphysics" but they miss the beef while focusing on the sizzle, bun and trimmings. There aren't that many 'out there' that can and do understand and I'm always on the look-out for those that do. Seems those that do are already standing on a Threshold of Greater Awareness and  can feel, see and step across that Threshold into varying levels of Cosmic Consciousness from time to time - which the dynaspheres facilitate. This facilitating of expanded consciousness and heart is the real value (currently) of dynaspheres. Even a casual review of the many testimonials reveals a breath-taking array of human enhancements.

Dynasphere Testimonials

http://www.svpvril.com/testimonials.html

Black Holes vs Neutral Centers

The concept  of Black Holes  is interesting to me because at the center of the dynaspheres is what we call a Neutral Center. The Neutral Center is similar yet different from conventional ideas of Black Holes. Just the other day I was watching a Nova episode (available through NetFlix.com) titled "Monster of the Milky Way" which is about the 'discovery' and exploration of what they think is a Black Hole at the very center of our galaxy. If you can get this episode I recommend it. While some of what they present is compelling they themselves admit they do not have a good definition of what a Black Hole is.

The conventional concept of a Black Hole is based almost entirely on their concept of gravity yet they have no description of what gravity is or how it works. They only have descriptions of what they perceive are actions of gravity. The other half of their Black Hole concept is based on Einstein's THEORY of Space/Time curvature which I regard as pure fantasy. Keely's definition of gravity makes far more sense than anyone else's ideas or definitions of gravity:

"Gravity is an eternal existing condition in etheric space, from which all visible forms are condensed. It is inherent in all forms of matter, visible and invisible. It is not subject to time or space. It is an established connective link between all forms of matter from their aggregation. Time is annihilated by it, as it has already traversed space when the neutral centers of the molecules were established. It is nothing more than an attractive, sympathetic stream, flowing towards the neutral center of the earth, emanating from molecular centers of neutrality, concordant with the earth's center of neutrality and seeking its medium of affinity with a power corresponding to the character of the molecular mass." [John Worrell Keely, circa 1886]

Science is NOT Religion

Often one sees a conversation or debate on the web wherein one side takes a strong position about the so-called inviolate "laws of physics" and claims these laws prevents so and so effect whether it be free energy, levitation, HHO mileage extensions, spirituality, life after death, Brown's Gas or whatever. Most if not all of these proponents have never dug through or investigated these so-called "laws of physics" and as such are simply mouthing the words of dogma and doctrine someone else said before them. In other words they are more like parrots or other trained non-thinking animal who learned that when doing what they are bid by their "superiors" (experts, teachers, employers, owners) they get rewarded. When they go against the status quo or contrary to the accepted or politically correct dogma and doctrine they are punished or penalized. This is of course more like a pious religious stance and nothing like real science wherein everything and every authority is persistently questioned. So the beat of ignorance and conceit goes on...

On the other hand science is not a democracy (mob rule). Facts are facts and are not decided by vote or consensus as is often done in the so-called environmental movement. Ideally science pursues truth no matter whose sacred cow gets gored. Unfortunately, the real world for science is to do what the guy with the money wants. For instance there are unlimited funds for inventing and producing services, products and processes for controlling and killing people. There are few funds for doing the opposite of promoting Life, Light and Love in our communities.

HHO and the "Keely Frequencies"

I get a lot of calls and emails from perfect strangers demanding I give them the frequencies Keely used to dissociate, "break" or "loosen" water. I'm always amazed at this. My stock answer is "If I had that information I would be sitting on a Caribbean beach and it would be my beach." And seeing as how valuable such information potentially is why would I simply give it up for FREE to a perfect stranger just because they demand I do so?

I could (and am) writing a book on just this topic. I am also conducting investigative research into the nature and generation of Brown's Gas and HHO. The basic elements pertaining to an answer to this question would include but are not limited to:

1) Frequencies of what? How? Why?

2) 99.99% of those seeking such information are not qualified to understand or apply the answer.

3) Obviously, there is MUCH MORE to the vibratory make-up and dissociation of water than a simple frequency. BTW, the so-called Keely Frequencies are and have been publicly available in the literature for over 115 years. See here. But unless one understands what Keely did and how and have a truer grasp of vibratory physics basics they are not going to be able to develop anything real as regards acoustic dissociation of water.

4) It is absurd to think water is "broken" or "loosened" by a single specific vibratory frequency or it would have already been done. And this is especially true of digitally developed square waves which Keely DID NOT have or use.

5) I've already written extensively about this on my web site. Please read and study it.

6) It is presumptuous to assume I would divulge any information to perfect strangers beyond what I'm already giving away for free through my books, lectures and web site. If you are serious and have legitimate business interests then contact me and we'll see what we can do together.

I could go on and on but you get the picture. There is not a simple solution to such a complex issue. If one truly seeks such information my suggestion is to read and study Keely and Russell's writings, my writings and lectures, conventional physics and watch all those YouTube videos on HHO, Joe Cells, Brown's Gas,  electrolysis, etc. There is a certain power of discovery in what does not work.....

Downstream Physics

Recently I've been reading on or about Einstein, Bearden, Feynman and all those crusty physicists. It is all very thought provoking. It seems to me, and I could be all wrong about this, as it looks like conventional science considers the physics of the universe to be about particles and fields only. I mean that is what I get out of all the theoretical stuff.

But can this be true? Can a particle/field view of the universe answer all the questions? I don't think so. It seems to me that particles are an EFFECT of vibratory/oscillatory motions. Fields are also expressions of vibratory and oscillatory actions and reactions. This then would indicate particles and fields are EFFECTS of some other CAUSE and that cause would be periodic motion in its varied forms. This brings us back to my original premise from some twenty-four  years ago that vibration is at the root of all physical manifestation and if we were to come to some deeper understanding of how the universe works we would need to study and understand the nature of vibration inside and out. Which of course is the very core and heart of SVP. SVP deals with CAUSE because cause is the fulcrum upon which great work can be done by applying principles and laws - the levers of physical science. The dogma and erudition of EFFECTS have no place in real science.