Thursday, November 13, 2008

Vibratory Health

What are the notes, intervals, time and beats of health giving sounds or music?

Sorry, I don't have those details as every case is different. What I do have are principles that if learned, understood and applied will reconstitute that condition known as "health":

"Health is harmony. Disease is discord." Keely

Harmony = balance = equilibrium in continuous interchange.

Health must have polarity and these polarities must interchange periodically. Without polarity there is death because lack of polarity is lack of that which makes life life; i.e., polar conflicts as in male/female, black/white, hot/cold, young/old, etc. Modern medicine does not recognize polarity which is a real shame on us all. Every cell of the body is polarized. Every organ in polarized. Every action of the body is polar; i.e., breathing in/out, heart beat contraction/expansion, blood flow out/back, etc. Disrupt these rhythmic motions and life ceases.

The ebb and flow of sound and music can reinforce these rhythms through synchronization, vibratory and oscillatory sympathy and entrainment. We tend to get sedentary and lose the natural polarization and rhythms of the body. ANY kind of rhythmic motion will assist in re-establishing natural vibrations and oscillations in the body and mind. Dance, massage, walking, running, swimming, breathing, chanting, music all reinforce the natural tones.

So to point to an answer to the original question it is all about CHORDS more than specific single tone frequencies. All tones are complex due to natural occurring harmonics. So even if one has good experiences with single tone frequencies it is an illusion because of the harmonics also being experienced at the same time and cannot be escaped although they can and often are ignored.

Read Walter Russell for conditions of harmony/heath and discord/disease, etc. To go even further read Phineas P. Quimby's writings on health as an EFFECT of one's thinking. His works are on the web and can be googled easily enough.

Sunday, November 2, 2008

The Word (Mind) of God

I do not disagree with you Tony. I just have a few more questions than most people permit themselves to entertain.

Take, for instance, a Bigger Picture...

How many stars are there in our galaxy called the Milky Way?
How many of those stars have occupied planets?
How many occupied planets are there in ONE galaxy?
How many galaxies are in this one photo (see above) of a teeny-weeny portion of our night sky?

How many of the countless peoples on these countless planets moving through countless galaxies have formed spiritual beliefs and written them down in their sacred texts?
How many of those countless texts would agree with each other?
Where would they agree and where would they differ?
Where and how did they get their "divine revelations"?

If you say they all got it from the same One Source then you have to explain how One Source/Entity can somewhat successfully communicate with all those countless people (in their own languages) independent of Time and Space. The only thing we know of that operates independently of Time and Space is Mind sometimes called consciousness and sometimes called undifferentiated or scalar waves by science. So could we then say God communicates to his peoples from His Mind and into their Consciousnesses? Would that be like so-called telepathy; i.e., direct communication from Divine Mind to maybe our 'Lesser Mind'? And what exactly is 'Mind' or 'Consciousness'? Is it "awareness" of self and no-self? Whatever it is is Mind not known to us via our thoughts? Are not then our thoughts a portion of our Minds? Are not then our thoughts an EXPRESSION of our Mind? Are not words an effect of our  thoughts? Therefore our words,  like our thoughts, are an expression of our  Mind.

So when a sacred text refers to the "Word of God" could it not be referring to an EXPRESSION of God? Is not the the word of God His expression? And can that Divine Expressioning take on different modes such as talking burning bushes (Moses) and thunderous disembodied voices, spontaneous revelation to consciousness (Peter), etc.?

My deeper feelings would have me question everything and suppose there is much more to this than we, sitting on this tiny and seemingly insignificant speck of dust in a back corner of our galaxy, could surmise from our all too brief view and contemplation of Time and Space and all that it means.

Wednesday, October 8, 2008

The Value of Dynaspheres

Lots of people misbelieve my work is mostly "airy-fairy physics-metaphysics" but they miss the beef while focusing on the sizzle, bun and trimmings. There aren't that many 'out there' that can and do understand and I'm always on the look-out for those that do. Seems those that do are already standing on a Threshold of Greater Awareness and  can feel, see and step across that Threshold into varying levels of Cosmic Consciousness from time to time - which the dynaspheres facilitate. This facilitating of expanded consciousness and heart is the real value (currently) of dynaspheres. Even a casual review of the many testimonials reveals a breath-taking array of human enhancements.

Dynasphere Testimonials

Monday, September 15, 2008

Black Holes vs Neutral Centers

The concept  of Black Holes  is interesting to me because at the center of the dynaspheres is what we call a Neutral Center. The Neutral Center is similar yet different from conventional ideas of Black Holes. Just the other day I was watching a Nova episode (available through titled "Monster of the Milky Way" which is about the 'discovery' and exploration of what they think is a Black Hole at the very center of our galaxy. If you can get this episode I recommend it. While some of what they present is compelling they themselves admit they do not have a good definition of what a Black Hole is.

The conventional concept of a Black Hole is based almost entirely on their concept of gravity yet they have no description of what gravity is or how it works. They only have descriptions of what they perceive are actions of gravity. The other half of their Black Hole concept is based on Einstein's THEORY of Space/Time curvature which I regard as pure fantasy. Keely's definition of gravity makes far more sense than anyone else's ideas or definitions of gravity:

"Gravity is an eternal existing condition in etheric space, from which all visible forms are condensed. It is inherent in all forms of matter, visible and invisible. It is not subject to time or space. It is an established connective link between all forms of matter from their aggregation. Time is annihilated by it, as it has already traversed space when the neutral centers of the molecules were established. It is nothing more than an attractive, sympathetic stream, flowing towards the neutral center of the earth, emanating from molecular centers of neutrality, concordant with the earth's center of neutrality and seeking its medium of affinity with a power corresponding to the character of the molecular mass." [John Worrell Keely, circa 1886]

Tuesday, July 22, 2008

Science is NOT Religion

Often one sees a conversation or debate on the web wherein one side takes a strong position about the so-called inviolate "laws of physics" and claims these laws prevents so and so effect whether it be free energy, levitation, HHO mileage extensions, spirituality, life after death, Brown's Gas or whatever. Most if not all of these proponents have never dug through or investigated these so-called "laws of physics" and as such are simply mouthing the words of dogma and doctrine someone else said before them. In other words they are more like parrots or other trained non-thinking animal who learned that when doing what they are bid by their "superiors" (experts, teachers, employers, owners) they get rewarded. When they go against the status quo or contrary to the accepted or politically correct dogma and doctrine they are punished or penalized. This is of course more like a pious religious stance and nothing like real science wherein everything and every authority is persistently questioned. So the beat of ignorance and conceit goes on...

On the other hand science is not a democracy (mob rule). Facts are facts and are not decided by vote or consensus as is often done in the so-called environmental movement. Ideally science pursues truth no matter whose sacred cow gets gored. Unfortunately, the real world for science is to do what the guy with the money wants. For instance there are unlimited funds for inventing and producing services, products and processes for controlling and killing people. There are few funds for doing the opposite of promoting Life, Light and Love in our communities.

Thursday, May 22, 2008

HHO and the "Keely Frequencies"

I get a lot of calls and emails from perfect strangers demanding I give them the frequencies Keely used to dissociate, "break" or "loosen" water. I'm always amazed at this. My stock answer is "If I had that information I would be sitting on a Caribbean beach and it would be my beach." And seeing as how valuable such information potentially is why would I simply give it up for FREE to a perfect stranger just because they demand I do so?

I could (and am) writing a book on just this topic. I am also conducting investigative research into the nature and generation of Brown's Gas and HHO. The basic elements pertaining to an answer to this question would include but are not limited to:

1) Frequencies of what? How? Why?
2) 99.99% of those seeking such information are not qualified to understand or apply the answer.
3) Obviously, there is MUCH MORE to the vibratory make-up and dissociation of water than a simple frequency. BTW, the so-called Keely Frequencies are and have been publicly available in the literature for over 115 years. See here. But unless one understands what Keely did and how and have a truer grasp of vibratory physics basics they are not going to be able to develop anything real as regards acoustic dissociation of water.
4) It is absurd to think water is "broken" or "loosened" by a single specific vibratory frequency or it would have already been done. And this is especially true of digitally developed square waves which Keely DID NOT have or use.
5) I've already written extensively about this on my web site. Please read and study it.
6) It is presumptuous to assume I would divulge any information to perfect strangers beyond what I'm already giving away for free through my books, lectures and web site. If you are serious and have legitimate business interests then contact me and we'll see what we can do together.

I could go on and on but you get the picture. There is not a simple solution to such a complex issue. If one truly seeks such information my suggestion is to read and study Keely and Russell's writings, my writings and lectures, conventional physics and watch all those YouTube videos on HHO, Joe Cells, Brown's Gas,  electrolysis, etc. There is a certain power of discovery in what does not work.....

Thursday, April 24, 2008

Downstream Physics

Recently I've been reading on or about Einstein, Bearden, Feynman and all those crusty physicists. It is all very thought provoking. It seems to me, and I could be all wrong about this, as it looks like conventional science considers the physics of the universe to be about particles and fields only. I mean that is what I get out of all the theoretical stuff.

But can this be true? Can a particle/field view of the universe answer all the questions? I don't think so. It seems to me that particles are an EFFECT of vibratory/oscillatory motions. Fields are also expressions of vibratory and oscillatory actions and reactions. This then would indicate particles and fields are EFFECTS of some other CAUSE and that cause would be periodic motion in its varied forms. This brings us back to my original premise from some twenty-four  years ago that vibration is at the root of all physical manifestation and if we were to come to some deeper understanding of how the universe works we would need to study and understand the nature of vibration inside and out. Which of course is the very core and heart of SVP. SVP deals with CAUSE because cause is the fulcrum upon which great work can be done by applying principles and laws - the levers of physical science. The dogma and erudition of EFFECTS have no place in real science.

Monday, April 14, 2008

God vs Darwin LOL

The mind of humanity is sometimes fool city. For some strange and unfathomable reason otherwise intelligent people go into this mode of answering a complex question with an "either/or" fixation. For instance, there is this insane argument in academia that the universe began as a materialistic development or evolutionary process while others in academia say God created it all. There does not seem to be a middle ground. The materialists have the financial upper hand currently and are expelling others who hold different views. The penduluum, it seems, has swung from religionists burning heretics at the stake to materialists destroying the lives of non-believers.

SVP offers the middle ground; i.e., there is an intelligence inherent in matter and energy that brings about self-organization and evolutionary development from IDEA to matter. Consciousness (intelligence) and Love (harmony) therefore rule throughout the universe. The universe is constantly creating itself. Science recognizes the running down (entropy) of the universe but it adamantly refuses to believe the universe is constantly re-creating itself. Any kid can see a tree grows (syntropy) then dies and disintegrates (entropy) - and then a new tree (syntropy) is created from the remains of the old. Ask any forester or gardener...

"Pure sympathetic concordants are as antagonistic to negative discordants as the negative is to the positive; but the vast volume the sympathetic holds over the non-sympathetic, in ethereal space, makes it at once the ruling medium and readjuster of all opposing conditions if properly brought to bear upon them." [Keely and His Discoveries, Chapter 7]

Wednesday, April 2, 2008

Science & Consciousness Conference

The conference in Santa Fe was great! My presentation was well received. It will be available on dvd from the web site above. I got to visit with some old friends and made some new friends. The hotel was amazing. It rambles all around and is as a maze to learn the long corridors and gaze at all the beautiful decorations. Atlin was of course swamped by people. They love to feel her energy and experience the high vibes of joy she radiates. The experience was well worth the time and effort to get there and back.

Saturday, March 29, 2008

Why is SVP so important?

In 1989 I was invited to present a paper on SVP at the Swiss Association for Free Energy. The conference was held in beautiful Einsiedeln, site of a famous monastery. The lecture I'd prepared had gotten filed away and forgotten until yesterday when I was discussing that conference with a friend. The paper was located earlier this morning and I have uploaded it to the web here.

Wednesday, March 26, 2008

Daniel Pomerleau

Daniel Pomerleau

This phenomenon reads almost identical to those demonstrations given by John Worrell Keely in the 1880s. We know now today Keely used Mind Force to power and control his machines. Pomerleau is showing us today this is possible and doable - once we dump dependence on Split-mindedness of rationalism and intellectualism and go to the Heart (Whole-mindedness). All my research with Sympathetic Vibratory Physics has been to uncover and understand the links between Mind and Matter such that this phenomenon becomes SCIENCE that it can be understood and harnessed to improve our lot in life. Keely, Cayce and Russell all wrote: "All force is Mind Force." We need but keep after this unexplored world of unlimited possibilities.

SVP Cosmology updated

The update (version 2.2) to the SVP Cosmology program is now shipping. The CD now contains over 900 pages of materials if printed out. The SVP Cosmology is profusely illustrated with over 360 graphics, tables and images. It includes Dale’s long rumored about but never publicized Etheric Vibratory Table with sixteen fields of correspondences and frequency data from the 1st to the 69th octaves. There is nothing like this table out there. All this and more to carefully sort through, organize, illustrate, review and explain what Keely, Russell, Cayce, Lewis and countless others had to say about a fresh new (for most of us) comprehensive paradigm that binds and bridges many fields of science, mathematics, music, philosophy, religion and art not only in jargon, understanding and practicality but also through Time and Space. You can read more about this massive expose of Keely and Russell's work here:

Read the customer testimonials

Monday, March 17, 2008

SVP is becoming a success

Sympathetic Vibratory Physics (SVP) is becoming a success. There are now at least two devices built by others who attribute some credit to SVP as source of inspiration.

A self-running electrical motor generator combination with 900 net watts output.

Over-unity ultrasonic water heater.

And then there are these "new" fields of scientific endeavor:


Quantum Entanglement

Coherent Coupling

As Steiner predicted, SVP will become the science of his future, which is our Now.

Friday, March 14, 2008

Violations of the so-called Second Law of Thermodynamics

Wikipedia: The second law says that the amount of random movement; i.e., the entropy, can only increase in a closed system; i.e., that we cannot put this randomness in order.

That is a strange definition because very random water vapor particles self-organize into beautiful geometric snow flakes.

First off there are no closed systems. They may be closed to a specified range of vibration but other more finer ranges will permeate any barriers.

Examples of Centropy (accumulating energy) as opposed to the mistaken idea there exists only Entropy.

1) Snow builded up in high mountains. Which when melted, releases stored gravity, will power hydroelectric plants.

2) Wood builded up in trees. Which when burned liberates heat that can create steam which can produce electric power.

3) Work Energy accumulated in an oxen or mule bodies. Which when put to work can produce power in many useful ways.

4) Warm air which is warmth stored up in great masses of air. Which when expended against cooler masses of air creates winds which when harnassed properly can produce electric power.

I'm sure if we put our minds to it we can come up with countless other examples where this law is shown to be bogus. Which brings up another mind-freeing thought: How many other "laws of physics" are bogus and have been holding us back from Greater Science and Technologies?

Second Law of Thermodynamics?

From Wikipedia:

The Second Law of Thermodynamics

“The entropy of an isolated system not in equilibrium will tend to increase over time, approaching a maximum value at equilibrium.”

In the Free or Alternate Energy world we hear sooo much about this "law" as though it were king of something. Unfortunately, most who talk about it can't seem to read plain English. The quote from Wikipedia includes the exclusionary term "isolated system". If it were possible to create a truly isolated system the law, as stated, might maybe be true, perhaps. But it is IMPOSSIBLE to create an isolated system therefore an isolated system is an impossibility. The premise and context of the law, as stated, is wrong-headed and is therefore meaningless.

1st) While it is possible to exclude some forms of energy from a system it is not possible to exclude all forms of energy from a system.

2nd) Quantity of Energy is predicated on polarity or difference of states. Therefore there are at least two states of energy where no discernible "useable" energy can be found: a) in harmonic conjugate form and b) in neutralized (depolar) state.

3rd) These non-observable forms may, under appropriate, circumstances, rekindle or aggregate into observable forms and quantities. This is centropy or as some chose to call it negentropy.

In sum while the Second Law may have some validity in some circumstances it does not hold in others and due to its not taking into account a fuller reflection of nature's dynamics it is also incomplete and should not be considered as a law but more as a general principle active in certain cases only.

Tuesday, March 11, 2008

Water for Fuel Systems

Water for Fuel systems

This is an interesting system. The company claims $4.5 million in sales with near zero refund requests. Perhaps they are on to something? What is so interesting are the comments after this article. One would think the naysayer hounds chewing on this company are not supportive of Alternative Energy sources, reduced pollution solutions and bettering their own future prospects. The general movement for Liberty happening world-wide in various venues including but not limited to the current U.S. Presidential campaign and the development of pollution and cost free energy sources, needs all the support it can get. These negative people would serve themselves and others better if they did more research, more bench tests and astute diverse testing and measuring and a lot less braying and howling at those who are putting themselves, their time, their MONEY and very lives into inventing a better future for us all - including for the snarling hounds who demand everything be for FREE, which, of course, ain't never gonna happen....

It cost time, effort and MONEY to do basic research and development. But then those who don't do any research wouldn't know that or appreciate it if they were told so.

PS: There is a simple explanation (in part anyway) why this system works - or any similar system. The basic concept behind the operative principle of how a small amount of specially produced gas can have a larger effect than a larger quantity of ordinarily produced gas can be deciphered from this:

A more update version of the above document is available here:

Sunday, March 9, 2008

Science & Consciousness Conference

I will be presenting at the Science & Consciousness Conference in Santa Fe. They have me slated to speak on April 1st for an hour and half. I'm debating whether to take Atlin or not. Having Atlin at these conferences is a turn on for people. I probably will take Atlin even though it is a lot of effort. Online information about this conference is here.

What I have been doing

I get emails and phone calls asking me what I have been working on. Mostly I've been writing and editing the SVP Cosmology. The published (free) version of that work can be seen here. This linked document is the public version (1.0). I have been working on version 2.0 which is now 2.1 and will be released as an update the end of this month or early April to those who've purchased the program. The Table of Contents to 2.1 can be seen here. This work is the final synthesis of all the years' of study I put into Keely, Russell et al. It is a veritable Rosetta Stone for the New Science paradigm struggling to birth itself upon the world scene.

Thursday, March 6, 2008

Welcome to the Sympsionics blog

This is a new effort to get the word out and get it talked about. I will be posting items of interest concerning SVP here from time to time. You are welcome to jump in and join the fun.